Skip to main content

Posts

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF PhD DISSERTATIONS ON EDUCATION IN PAKISTAN

 COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF PhD DISSERTATIONS ON EDUCATION IN PAKISTAN   Keywords : Model PhD research dissertation; Guidelines for writing excellent research report; excellent research Abstract ;writing excellent literature review; excellent Research Topic; excellent Introduction; excellent research Objectives ; excellent research Questions ; excellent research Literature review ; excellent research   Methodology/ R-design ; excellent research   Samples; excellent research   Tools of Data Collection ; excellent research Data Analysis & Result; excellent research Response to Questions ; excellent research Discussion ; excellent research   Conclusion; excellent research   Suggestions; excellent research     Ethics of ; excellent research Written Report Organization; excellent research   Citation. How to do and write an excellent research report, read my PhD dissertation titled 'COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF PhD DISSERTATIONS ON EDUCATION IN PAKISTAN&

A Comparative Analysis of Research Quality of Public and Private Universities

                Muhammad S.1 Ahmad S.M.2 Iqbal M.3 and Neman M.2 Available online at: www.isca.in, www.isca.me Received 21st January 2014, revised 30th March 2014, accepted 1st June 2014   Abstract This paper discusses findings from a study designed for evaluating PhD dissertations and comparing quality of dissertations of public and private universities. The main objectives of the study were to evaluate the research quality of PhD education dissertations of public and private sector universities in Pakistan and to compare and analyze the dissertation quality of public and private sector universities in Pakistan. Of 308 PhD education dissertations, 178 dissertations were evaluated on a twenty-element rubric created for the evaluation of PhD dissertations in education.The main finding of the study is that the dissertation quality of public sector universities was found better than private sector universities on several categories of the rubric. The difference was s